First I appreciate the great majority of features in the magazine (even the extra-reverent Dawkins-leaning bits); thank you.

But now, what’s this? (Oxford Today, Michaelmas 2014, p. 53), re Rowan Williams:

‘…. to appear to cave in to the anti-gay mob early on…’

If this tabloid-speak truly represents the boundaries of your grasp of the issues, events and personalities of this period, might it not be better to ask someone else to write reviews of books dealing with such matters?

Or is that your tutor was more lenient with student prose and perceptiveness than mine was?